<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Code-Review on David Bensoussan</title><link>https://blog.bensoussan.de/tags/code-review/</link><description>Recent content in Code-Review on David Bensoussan</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.bensoussan.de/tags/code-review/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Six Checks Against AI Slop</title><link>https://blog.bensoussan.de/post/2026-08-05-six-checks-against-ai-slop/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://blog.bensoussan.de/post/2026-08-05-six-checks-against-ai-slop/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://github.com/immich-app/immich/pull/30514"&gt;feat(transcription): automatic video subtitle generation via faster-whisper #30514&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; — closed · 17 commits · 3,035 tests passing · 0 lint errors · &lt;code&gt;auto-closed:llm&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My AI-assisted pull request to &lt;a href="https://github.com/immich-app/immich"&gt;immich&lt;/a&gt;, an open-source project, was closed within minutes today because an LLM was involved. Their policy forbids it:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We ask you not to open PRs generated with an LLM. We find that code generated like this tends to need a large amount of back-and-forth, which is a very inefficient use of our time.
We cannot have any confidence in an LLM, so if it&amp;rsquo;s non-trivial for us to verify it works and you don&amp;rsquo;t show that you fully understand all implications of the change, reviewing the PR is not worth our time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>